business support, information and advice


Loading

Good for Europe’s Exports, Not So Good for Europe

BUSINESS STRATEGY – It used to be easy to sum up the way European business executives viewed exchange rates: a strong dollar was good; a strong euro was bad.

Good for Europe’s Exports, Not So Good for Europe, myhusbandstolemyblog.comMost still think that, but as the euro glides down from the peak of more than $1.50 it reached in November, trading on Tuesday at $1.37, some problems are emerging that complicate the picture.

Yes, the weaker euro is good for European exporters. It makes it easier for their cars, machinery and beer to compete on price abroad and makes every sale to the United States — and to countries like China whose currencies are closely tied to the dollar — more valuable in euros.

The weakening euro also is good news for Greece, Spain and Portugal, which are suffering from excessive trade deficits and struggling to become more competitive in world markets.

“I haven’t heard of anybody who is sad about it,” said Ralph Wiechers, the chief economist of the German Engineering Federation, an industry group in Frankfurt that represents makers of machine tools and other capital goods.

But there is also a range of negative effects. The cost of oil and other raw materials priced in dollars is rising. Consumer prices could come under pressure because goods imported from outside Europe become more expensive in euro terms.

More important, there is a queasy feeling that the decline of the euro makes an uncomfortable statement about Europe’s chronic tendency to underperform the United States in economic growth.

The euro’s decline reflects the harsh verdict of investors on the Greek debt crisis and the monetary union’s inability to insure that its members adhere to basic principles of fiscal prudence.

“It’s more of a euro weakness than a dollar strength,” said Ulf Schneider, chief executive of Fresenius, a German health care company. “The whole world is watching, and there is some doubt about the euro.”

The euro has bounced back from its recent low of about $1.35 in February, reflecting more optimism that Greece is taking decisive steps to reduce its 12.7 percent budget deficit. A short spike back to $1.40 or so is possible over the next few weeks as investors who bet against the euro unwind their positions, currency analysts at Commerzbank in Frankfurt said.

On Monday, the euro slipped against the dollar to $1.3672 in late trading in New York amid uncertainty about whether European economic ministers meeting in Brussels would figure out a way to help Greece while maintaining pressure on Greek leaders to reduce their deficit. Those concerns subsided somewhat on Tuesday after Standard & Poor’s announced that it was taking Greece off its negative credit watch, lowering the threat of a downgrade. The euro rebounded to $1.3756. Read more »

Underwater Cable an Alternative to Electrical Towers

BUSINESS STRATEGY – Generating 20 percent of America’s electricity with wind, as recent studies proposed, would require building up to 22,000 miles of new high-voltage transmission lines. But the huge towers and unsightly tree-cutting that these projects require have provoked intense public opposition.

Underwater Cable an Alternative to Electrical Towers, myhusbandstolemyblog.comRecently, though, some companies are finding a remarkably simple answer to that political problem. They are putting power lines under water, in a string of projects that has so far provoked only token opposition from environmentalists and virtually no reaction from the larger public.

“The fish don’t vote,” said Edward M. Stern, president of PowerBridge, a company that built a 65-mile offshore cable from New Jersey to Long Island and is working on two more.

The projects have even drawn cautious enthusiasm from some environmental groups that say the new power lines serve their goal of getting the United States to use more renewable power.

“Environmentalists need to be open-minded to technology improvements, and looking at the big picture,” said Phillip Musegaas, program director for Riverkeeper, a New York environmental group focused on the Hudson River.

Mr. Musegaas’s open-mindedness will soon be put to the test, because Transmission Developers, a Toronto company, is proposing to use the Hudson for the most ambitious underwater transmission project yet. Beginning north of the Canadian border, a 370-mile line would run along the bottom of Lake Champlain, down the bed of the Hudson all the way to New York City. It would continue under Long Island Sound to Connecticut.

The project sponsors have only recently begun seeking the numerous permits they need, but if built, it would be one of the longest submarine power cables in the world. It would bring hydroelectricity to the power-thirsty New York City market. It would also break a stalemate; New York has not had a major new overhead power line in 20 years.

If Transmission Developers succeeds with such an ambitious project, other transmission developers are likely to study the underwater strategy to figure out just how far they can take it. Would power lines crossing the Great Lakes make sense? Could underwater cables be used to move renewable power from the windy Great Plains to cities like Chicago?

The cost of putting a cable under water can be lower than burying cables on land, because workers can lay the cables from giant reels, allowing stretches of more than a mile with no splices. The strategy is limited, of course, by the availability of rivers and lakes — they do not go everywhere power developers would like to run new lines. In fact, many of the country’s rivers run north or south, whereas much of the country’s power must move east or west. Read more »

Page 6 of 28« First...456781020...Last »